Blog

Project Twinkle: The U.S. Air Force’s Green Fireball Investigation

The document cover of Project Twinkle

The U.S. Air Force program that scientifically investigated the mysterious “green fireball” sightings

NameProject Twinkle
DurationFrom 1948 to 1951
PurposeTo capture data on the green fireball sightings and find an explanation
Investigated byU.S. Air Force and several scientists

It is a well known fact that the Russians have been hard at work on several urgent projects to study ‘fireballs.’ Many years ago, the Air Force concluded a study of the mysterious ‘green fireballs’ in the Southwestern states in the U.S.A. It was called ‘PROJECT TWINKLE,’ but its findings have never been revealed.1

When UFO sightings are reported, they’re almost, by default, attributed to matters like balloons or meteorites. However, in rare cases, many witnesses would refute these arguments, and such happened in the ‘green fireballs’ sightings—the event that brought rise to ‘Project Twinkle.’

What Is Project Twinkle?

Night after night, from late 1948 to early 1951, residents of the Southwestern U.S. observed the skies light up with green orbs.

The nature of these sightings prompted the military to respond. Unfortunately, both scientists and the U.S. Air Force (USAF) personnel had difficulty identifying the objects, which led the latter to fund the classified investigation: Project Twinkle.

Project Twinkle was part of another classified program, Project Grudge, which preceded Project Blue Book. Its objectives weren’t just limited to identifying what these objects were. It was also established to determine why they appeared near sensitive military research installations.

This fireball research project was initiated by Dr. Joseph Kaplan and Lt. Col. Frederick Oder and began with a $20,0002 half-year contract with Land-Air Inc. The company set up a 24-hour watch using cinetheodolites to capture and document these ‘green fireballs.’

Investigations were conducted over two contract phases and were presented as a scientific report. Multiple conferences were also held to review the captured data and reach a concrete explanation of the phenomenon.

How Did Project Twinkle Officially Begin?

While Dr. Kaplan and Lt. Col. Oder initiated Project Twinkle, the idea came from Dr. Lincoln LaPaz. As a meteor specialist, Dr. LaPaz paid close attention to the green fireballs and concluded that these weren’t natural.

He shared his speculations with the USAF, stating that if these weren’t from the U.S., they were likely “Russian and a threat.”3 His insight prompted the military to launch the program.

But what exactly occurred during the ‘green fireball’ sightings that led to Project Twinkle?

The ‘Green Fireballs’ Incident

The first of the numerous sightings that sparked the ‘Green Fireballs’ incident happened in the evening of December 5, 1948. Witnesses reported green fireballs moving across the sky over Los Alamos, which grew in number over the next three months.

Here’s a comprehensive breakdown4 of the early phase of the green fireball sightings before the USAF stepped in with Project Twinkle.

December 1948

Date Events
12/05
  • A USAF C-47 crew saw a green flare-like light at Las Vegas, NM.
  • Pioneer Air Flight 63 also reported seeing a similar green light in the same area.
  • A conference was immediately held between the Department of Justice, the army, and the USAF to evaluate.
12/06
  • Kirtland AFB Office of Special Investigations (OSI) agent Melvin Neef interviewed the crew of Pioneer Air Flight 63. They described the incident differently: as a white flash with a whitish-orange object.
  • A security officer, Joseph Tolouse, reported seeing a greenish flare for 2-3 seconds over Sandia Base.
12/08
  • Kirtland OSI interviewed several authorities who claimed they saw nothing or didn’t receive any reports about these flares:
    • Capt. Miller of the New Mexico State Police
    • K.D. Flock, Supervisor at Santa Fe National Forest
    • Matt O’Brien, Chief of Police in Las Vegas
    • J.D. Miller, a local CAA officer, and four of his employees
  • K.D. Flock, however, shared that in 1947, a woman named Madeline G. Merchant contacted him several times to report “luminous phenomena.”
  • The Kirtland OSI agents (Stahl and Neef) saw a brilliant green light and compared it to a USAF green flare, but larger. It lasted for two seconds before dropping off with orange fragments.
12/09
  • The Kirtland OSI agents, along with OSI District Commander Lt. Col. Doyle Rees, interviewed Col. William Hayes. He claimed that on Nov. 3, 4, and 23, he saw a bright white light near Vaughn, NM.
12/12
  • Dr. LaPaz saw a “5’ bright green fireball” traveling east-to-west. He described it as wobbling and breaking into several fragments before burning out.
  • He reported this to Sidney Newburger at Los Alamos and found that several perimeter guards also saw it.
12/20
  • A Los Alamos patrol reported seeing a greenish-white light, describing it as “¼ full moon size.”
  • George Skipper and Lt. Clifford also reported simultaneous observations.

January 1949

Date Events
1/13
  • Col. Eustis Poland of the U.S. Army issued a memo with the initial hypotheses concerning the phenomena:
    • Agencies in New Mexico are concerned about the green fireballs, thinking these are ‘sensing shots.’
    • These are due to radiological warfare experiments and may be lethal.
    • The U.S. may be carrying out top-secret experiments.
      Eustis Poland’s memo
1/24
  • Another green fireball appeared near Socorro.
1/25
  • Dr. William Crozier, Dr. LaPaz’s colleague, collected air samples at NM School of Mines in Socorro and obtained large amounts of microscopic copper spherules.
1/26
  • A second air sample was collected, and additional copper articles were obtained, convincing Dr. LaPaz of the fireballs’ artificiality.
1/30
  • Several witnesses observed a pale-blue object in Germany, describing it as sounding like a missile.
  • Another green fireball was seen in New Mexico.
  • Dr. LaPaz interviewed over 100 witnesses within two hours, including:
    • Military personnel
    • Guards
    • Oil workers
    • Aircrew
    • Control tower personnel
1/31
  • Lt. Col. Doyle Rees approved an on-the-ground search for any debris and materials from the fireballs.
  • The FBI also issued a memo to J.Edgar Hoover with the subject, “Projection of Vital Installations.”

The Official Conferences

During the green fireball sightings, scientists and the USAF held three conferences to discuss how to examine the phenomenon.

First Conference

On February 16, 1949,5 the first conference was organized at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. Laboratory director Norris Bradbury, physicists Frederick Reines and Edward Teller, and Dr. Lincoln LaPaz were in attendance. The Atomic Energy Commission and the U.S. military also accompanied them.

By the end of this session, the attendees were still skeptical about attributing the sightings to extraterrestrial activity. Yet, even after concluding that no sufficient information had been gathered about the phenomenon to prove it was a threat, it was still classified alongside the “flying discs” within Project Grudge.

Second Conference

Following a classified letter from the USAF Chief of Staff to Air Materiel Command (AMC) with the subject “Light Phenomena,” a second session was held in October 1949.

Air Force Research Laboratories’ representatives and Base Directorate for Geophysical Research Division (GRD)1 were requested to attend alongside the previous attendees.

Third Conference

On March 5, 1950, another conference was held at Wright-Patterson AFB, with personnel from Holloman Air Force Base and GRD. During this session, a three-point program was established and confirmed by AMC on March 16, 1950.1

  • Askania instrument triangulation by Land-Air Inc.
  • Observations with Mitchell camera using spectrum grating by Holloman Air Force Base personnel.
  • Electromagnetic frequency measurements using Signal Corps Engineering Laboratory equipment.

These actions were carried out under a six-month contract with Land-Air Inc., under which the company was tasked with maintaining constant watch over two Askania stations. This commenced the official beginning of the investigations under Project Twinkle.

Who Worked on Project Twinkle?

The most prominent figures involved in this program were the U.S. Air Force and a group of scientists tasked to resolve the mystery. However, if you look through the project’s documents, some names were repeated and emphasized more than the others. Among these names were:

Dr. Lincoln LaPaz

As a meteor specialist in the area, Dr. LaPaz was actively involved in the entire phenomenon. He was first introduced to the events on December 9, 1948, when OSI agent Neef interviewed him.

Upon learning that other sightings had been reported elsewhere, the meteor specialist paid special attention to the case and investigated it. By December 12, 1948,4 he drove to Las Vegas, New Mexico, with Lt. Allan Clark and Major Charles Phillips to look for any traces or debris from December 5. This was also the day he had his personal experience with the green fireballs.

Dr. LaPaz’s method of examining the phenomenon primarily revolved around finding physical evidence. Given his background, he knew how to track where meteors might have landed and left debris. However, despite his efforts, his searches were always unsuccessful.

This was among the reasons why he was convinced the green fireballs weren’t meteors. Also, he argued that:6

  • The fireballs’ trajectory was too flat.
  • Their color was too green.

Dr. Anthony Mirarchi

Dr. Mirarchi was the Chief of the Air Composition branch at GRD. He was initially the lead investigator for Project Twinkle,2 but he retired in October 1950.

Before he left, his most prominent accomplishment was requesting a brief report on the April 27 and May 24 sightings from Holloman AFB. This report contained:

  • A confirmation that there were multiple objects, as many as eight, sighted
  • A Data Reduction report2 from Holloman AFB’s analysis of the April 27 photos

Data Reduction Report
Objects observed following MX776A test of 27 April 1950 
2nd Lt. (name censored) EHOSIR 15 May 50
  1. According to conversation between Col. Baynes and Capt. Bryant, the following information is submitted directly to Lt. Albert.
  2. Film from station P10 was read, resulting in azimuth and elevation angles being recorded on four objects. In addition, size of image on film was recorded.
  3. From this information, together with a single azimuth angle from station M7, the following conclusions were drawn:
    a. The objects were at an altitude of approximately 150,000 ft.
    b. The objects were over the Holloman range between the base and Tularosa Peak.
    c. The objects were approximately 30 feet in diameter.
    d. The objects were traveling at an undeterminable, yet high speed.
						(signed)
						Wilbur L. Mitchell
						Mathematician
						Data Reduction Unit
					

Shop the latest

UFO Connect Merchandise

UFO Connect tote bag
Merch Item White Hoodie
UFO Connect brown hoodie

Dr. Mirarchi also firmly believed that the green fireball sightings weren’t meteors or balloons misidentified. He went on to explain that these were regularly observed, but stopped only after the cinetheodolites were installed.

With these, he postulated that the fireballs were probably missiles from Russia and accused the government of hiding this threat from the public.

What Did Project Twinkle Actually Observe?

At its inception, Project Twinkle operated under two separate contracts or phases. Here’s a rundown of some important dates during each.1

Contract 1: April to September, 1950
Date Events
April 27 and May 24 Some photographic activities occurred, but simultaneous sightings from both cameras weren’t captured.
No information was gained.
August 30 Aerial phenomena were observed near Holloman Air Force Base. However, no one was notified, and no results were obtained.

During this initial six-month period, no information was gathered, and the entire operation was considered negative. The USAF also decided to withdraw active funding for the facilities involved in the project, which weren’t utilized due to a decrease in sightings.

In late August, activity over Holloman AFB surged. This was considered sufficiently significant, which was why the Land-Air Inc. contract was extended for another six months.

For the second contract, which ran from October 1950 to March 1951,1 any aircraft operating around Holloman were tasked with reporting any unusual observations. Unfortunately, most of the occasional reports gathered during this period were considered sketchy and inconclusive.

By March 31, 1951, the Land-Air Inc. contract expired, and no extensions were made. The results were also considered negative.

The Recorded List of Sightings

Ironically, more sightings were reported before the entire Project Twinkle setup was established. By March 24, 1950, Lt. Col. Rees of the OSI at Kirtland had been compiling reported green fireball sightings around New Mexico.

The catalog showed the following data.2

New Mexico Sightings in 1949:

  • 17 sightings from Sandia Base, Albuquerque
  • 26 sightings from Los Alamos
  • None from the Vaughn area
  • 12 sightings from Holloman AFB/Alamogordo/White Sands
  • 20 sightings from other areas in Southwest New Mexico

New Mexico Sightings in Jan-March, 1950:

  • 6 sightings from Sandia Base, Albuquerque
  • 7 sightings from Los Alamos
  • 1 sighting from Vaughn
  • 6 sightings from Holloman AFB/Alamogordo/White Sands
  • 6 sightings from other areas in Southwest New Mexico

What Were the Conclusions Drawn by Project Twinkle?

The final report from Project Twinkle was written in November 1951 by Dr. Louis Elterman,2 the then-director of the program. According to the report, the project was a failure as no further information was gained about the green fireball sightings.

A good many of the observations reported are attributable to ordinary man-made objects such as airplane, balloons, smoke rockets, etc.1

Project Twinkle claimed that the sightings were either: (1) balloons, or (2) small emissive clouds from atomic installations. It also quoted Dr. Fred Whipple’s August 9, 1950, memo, which indicated instances of “small detached clouds”1 mistakenly identified as aerial objects.

However, this didn’t reflect a conclusive opinion on the incident. Instead, it sparked further discourse, especially given some inconsistencies.

There is considerable doubt in the minds of some of the project personnel that this is a natural phenomenon. As long as a reasonable doubt exists, it is not wise to discontinue entirely the observations.1

What Is the Significance of Project Twinkle in Modern Ufology?

While Project Twinkle was widely considered a failure in its mission to explain the green fireball sightings, it still succeeded in carefully documenting a UAP phenomenon.

The establishment of a comprehensive action plan to capture the unidentified objects underscored the U.S. military’s seriousness about the situation. This makes the project one of the earliest attempts to scientifically study the phenomenon.

Today, it is often cited as a precursor to modern UFO investigations, demonstrating that the government recognized the potential truth behind the matter.

If you want to learn more about UFO investigations, browse through UFO Connect’s selection.

FAQ

Why did the U.S. start Project Twinkle?

The U.S. started Project Twinkle to investigate frequent green fireball sightings over New Mexico, especially near sensitive military areas such as Holloman AFB.

Did Project Twinkle prove UFOs were real?

Unfortunately, Project Twinkle didn’t officially prove that UFOs were real, but it did document that the green fireballs seen over New Mexico weren’t natural either.

Why was Project Twinkle shut down?

Project Twinkle was discontinued due to the lack of indications that the green fireball sightings were anything but natural. The Air Force recommended shutting it down to avoid further draining the agency’s funds over an uncertain issue.

References

1 “Project Twinkle.” The Black Vault, https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/projectbluebook/ProjectTwinkle-November1951.pdf. Accessed April 15, 2026.

2 “NCP-13: White Sands Films, Mirarchi, and Project Twinkle.” NICAP, https://www.nicap.org/ncp/ncp-brumac2.htm. Accessed April 17, 2026.

3 “NCP-12: The White Sands Proof.” NICAP, https://www.nicap.org/ncp/ncp-brumac.htm. Accessed April 17, 2026.

4 “Green Fireball Chronology.” Project 1947, https://www.project1947.com/gfb/gfbchron.html. Accessed April 15, 2026.

5 “FOIA requests at the National Security Research Center.” Los Alamos National Laboratory, https://www.lanl.gov/media/publications/the-vault/1124-foia-requests-at-the-national-security-research-center. Accessed April 17, 2026.

6 “Chapter Four: Green Fireballs, Project Twinkle, Little Lights, and Grudge.” Internet Sacred Text Archive, https://sacred-texts.com/ufo/rufo/rufo06.htm. Accessed April 17, 2026.

Access the UFO CONNECT UFO & UAP Archive

Register today to join search and view the complete UFO Connect UFO & UAP archive.

1000s of UFO Reports, Images and Videos

UFO Archive

Latest UFO & UAP Blogs​